Stale Context
The proposal may be based on source or state that has already changed.
AI GOVERNANCE ENGINEERING
A model may propose an action. The surrounding software determines whether that proposal is eligible, authorized, applied, recorded, and recoverable.
THE ACTION BOUNDARY
Source, configuration, memory, permissions, records, communications, and financial state require more than a plausible model response.
FAILURE MODES
The proposal may be based on source or state that has already changed.
The requested operation can fall outside the system’s declared authority.
A decision can be detached from the exact proposal or evidence it was meant to cover.
One step may succeed while another fails, leaving state between intended outcomes.
An approved change can still be incorrect or break behavior elsewhere.
A log that cannot bind decision, policy, state, and result is not a useful control record.
HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP
Human approval is not a ritual for every action. It is one boundary among several, applied where consequence, reversibility, confidence, and external impact warrant it.
Read-only analysis and drafts.
Known tools, schemas, and reversible scope.
Explicit approval for consequential durable change.
EVIDENCE + PROVENANCE
Hashes can detect byte changes. They do not authenticate a human, make a record immutable, or create an independent security boundary.
RECOVERY BEFORE MUTATION
A recovery path should exist before durable state is changed. Regression tests, outcome checks, and explicit failure handling remain necessary after authorization.
PUBLIC PROOF
CLU evaluates AI-proposed source changes against local policy, binds the decision to evidence, and keeps approval and application outside its current authority.
BOUNDED CLAIMS
ENGINEER THE BOUNDARY
Describe the action, the authority it requires, and the consequence of a bad decision.